Last week, Network World published an intriguing story on How Much Should You Spend on IT Security (http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/092210-how-much-should-you-spend.html?hpg1=bn). According to Gartner, enterprise security spending breaks down into the following categories: 37% personnel, 25% software, 20% hardware, 10% outsourcing and 9% consulting. It’s clear that if companies want to drive significant reductions in IT security spending, they must focus on personnel and software. But, how?
The problem is that traditional technologies – especially in the network security sector – are designed to extract as many resources as possible from the enterprise. First of all, a secure network requires separate investments in firewalls, IPS and other network devices, as well as a host of log management, reporting, high availability and other tools. Furthermore, there are few options for managing all of these devices and functions in a centralized manner. That means more manpower needed to configure, update and support the network. Now – let’s throw in the fact that most enterprises are now juggling physical and virtual network security infrastructure. It’s downright overwhelming, both strategically and fiscally.
The answer is simple: the only way that vendors can really deliver on their promise to reduce network security costs is to deliver comprehensive security solutions that centralize network management. No more unnecessary bolt-on purchases – management, reporting and availability should be built directly into the solution. Finally, vendors must make it easy for companies to manage their complex networks from a single place. That includes their physical and virtual network, as well as all of the different devices on the network regardless of vendor. The paradigm for network security products is shifting, led in part by Stonesoft.
How do you think today’s companies can most easily reduce security costs without decreasing security effectiveness?


(2 votes, average: 4.50 out of 5)


Recent Comments